Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Infrastructure Sewer topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Anderson/Anniston Township sewer district seeks $700,000 CDBG for Phase 1 collection repairs

Rush County Commissioners · September 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Mendenhall & Associates said the Anderson Township Regional Sewer District’s Phase 1 sewer project totals about $857,500 and the district will request $700,000 in CDBG funding, proposing Rural Water of Indiana as a local match; the firm asked commissioners to approve the district’s application for the next available rounds.

Tina Henderson of Mendenhall & Associates appeared before the commissioners to present a CDBG application request on behalf of the Anderson Township Regional Sewer District (sometimes referenced as Anniston/Anderson in remarks).

Henderson said the county previously approved a planning grant for Anderson Township and that the planning work resulted in a proposed Phase 1 project with a total cost of approximately $857,500. Phase 1 would include roughly 2,400 linear feet of cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining and televising 100% of the collection system in coordination with Millroy Regional Sewer District.

Henderson requested $700,000 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the Phase 1 build. She said the district intended to use a Rural Water of Indiana loan as the local match, and that the county would act as a passthrough entity to receive and disperse funds to contractors if the grant is awarded. Henderson asked the commissioners to approve the district’s application for round 2 of 2025 and round 1 of 2026, noting communities typically apply multiple rounds to secure funding.

Board response and next steps: the presenter provided application materials and indicated she would be at the commissioners’ meeting on the 20th to follow up. The transcript shows commissioners asked clarifying questions; the excerpt does not record a final vote but includes acknowledgement the application would be presented to the commissioners again.