Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the General Obligation Bond topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council discusses proposed $4 million general obligation bond; allocations to be set at joint meeting
Summary
Council members discussed a proposed general obligation bond initially suggested at $4 million, including whether project dollar amounts are attached and how proceeds would be split between county and commissioners' capital funds; the bond will be taken up at a joint meeting the following day.
The Floyd County Council on Aug. 25 reviewed a proposed general obligation (GO) bond that will be formally discussed and voted at a joint meeting scheduled the next day.
Moderator (Speaker 1) said paperwork for the GO bond had been circulated without dollar amounts and that the council’s agenda had been revised; the bond will be discussed and voted at the joint meeting. Council Member (Speaker 5) asked whether specific capital projects and dollar amounts were tied to the bond or whether the $4,000,000 figure was a placeholder.
Council members and staff confirmed there are project lists attached to the concept but that dollar amounts in the circulated paperwork were not specified. Moderator (Speaker 1) and Council Member (Speaker 4) explained that if the bond proceeds are approved, revenue could be split between a county capital fund and a commissioners’ capital fund. Council Member (Speaker 4) said historical practice showed splits in prior authorizations and that commissioners select priority projects for their share.
Speakers cited examples of possible uses for the council’s share, including sheriff’s vehicles and IT upgrades, and discussed logistics of whether funds would be disbursed upfront or over several years. Council members agreed final dollar allocations and the mechanics of disbursement will be addressed at the joint meeting where commissioners are present to set priorities.
Next step: The GO bond amount and project-level allocations will be on the joint meeting agenda the next day for formal action; no vote on the bond occurred at the Aug. 25 council meeting.
