Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council tables pickleball decision after staff study flags cost, code and aesthetic issues

Cerritos City Council and Successor Agency · January 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff advised against replacing water features at Cerritos Park East for pickleball, citing regulatory, ADA and drought compliance challenges and $1.5 million estimated reconstruction costs per site; the council voted 4–0 to table the matter until after the March election and asked staff to consider broader options, including county facilities or a larger tournament‑style venue.

City staff presented the results of a review into potential sites for pickleball courts on the city’s east side and recommended caution in converting existing water‑feature sites.

“After their thorough inspection they found significant regulatory challenges present at all 3 of our locations including those that surround health and safety code concerns, building code deficiencies, and compliance with State Water Conservation guidelines,” Recreation Services Superintendent Sherry Titus said, summarizing an outside consultant’s findings. The Aquatic Design Group estimated reconstruction of a water feature at roughly $1.5 million per site; full removal was estimated at $50,000–$75,000.

Titus told the council she would not recommend installing a fence around courts sited in the central pond area because of liability and aesthetic concerns: “I would not recommend installing any fences.” Councilmembers and park users debated alternatives such as converting tennis courts to dual‑use, partnering with county facilities, or developing a larger tournament‑style facility that could be planned as a capital project.

Residents who spoke urged earlier morning hours for summer play and raised concerns about crowding at other nearby courts. Several councilmembers said they favored a more comprehensive plan rather than piecemeal installations across parks.

Councilmember Barrows moved, and Councilmember Johnson seconded, a motion to table consideration of the item until after the March election; the motion passed 4–0.