Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Parcel 9 Sp5 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Placentia council adopts amendment lowering Parcel 9 minimum density to 15 units per acre
Summary
On March 18, 2025 the Placentia City Council voted 3–2 to introduce and adopt ordinance O‑2025‑02, amending Specific Plan 5 to reduce the minimum residential density on Parcel 9 from 65 to 15 dwelling units per acre. Council and public commenters debated parking, safety and housing‑policy tradeoffs.
The Placentia City Council voted 3–2 on March 18, 2025 to adopt Ordinance O‑2025‑02, changing the minimum residential density on Parcel 9 within Specific Plan 5 from 65 to 15 dwelling units per acre.
Staff told the council that the amendment is a text change only and does not approve any new development; the environmental review (CEQA) for the previously approved 248‑unit project remains in effect and any materially different proposal would require further review (staff presentation, SEG 1188–1296). The planning commission had recommended denial of the amendment, citing concerns that reduced minimums could set a precedent that would complicate the city’s housing goals (SEG 1231–1240).
Public comment spanned both sides. Supporters of higher density said greater housing capacity can reduce vehicle reliance and support downtown revitalization; opponents, including nearby residents and commenters who cited parking congestion on nearby streets, urged caution and asked for more specifics on how a lower minimum would be managed to avoid adverse impacts on public safety and neighborhood parking (public comments, SEG 1358–1453). Staff and the applicant repeatedly emphasized: adopting the code amendment does not by itself change the currently approved project; any modifications to an entitlement would return to planning and the council and could trigger CEQA review (SEG 1500–1510).
On roll call the ordinance passed by a 3–2 margin: Councilmembers Hummer and Smith recorded “No”; Councilmember Yamaguchi, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor recorded “Yes” (roll‑call recorded at SEG 1745–1756). The ordinance was introduced for first reading and the council took direction to return materials as required for codification.
What happens next: staff said the amendment would be processed per municipal code, with implementation steps including municipal code updates and any future project entitlements processed through standard planning and public‑hearing channels. The council record shows alternatives discussed included no minimum density or an intermediate minimum between 15 and 65 units per acre.
A final administrative note: staff advised that if an applicant later seeks to modify the approved project in a way that materially departs from the current entitlement, CEQA and the entitlement process would apply at that time.
