Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mou Afscme topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Linn County supervisors approve MOU restoring grievance rights for early discipline in 2–1 vote
Summary
The board approved a memorandum of understanding with AFSCME Local 231 to allow grievances over oral and written discipline at first and second steps; supporters cited fairness and historically low grievance counts, while opponents warned it could politicize informal warnings.
Linn County supervisors voted Sept. 22 to approve a memorandum of understanding with AFSCME Local 231 that restores grievance rights for oral and written disciplinary actions at the first two steps of progressive discipline. The motion carried by voice vote, 2–1.
Lisa Powell, Linn County’s human resources director, briefed the board on the MOU and its background. She said the county’s contract language was modified in 2021 to limit grievances to later stages of discipline, but that AFSCME requested the county reinstate earlier grievance rights prior to the contract’s expiration. Powell said her recommendation remained that substantive contract changes normally be addressed during formal contract negotiations, but she presented the MOU at the union’s request for the board’s consideration.
Supervisors asked about historical grievance counts and administrative impact. Powell said she did not have complete data at the table but that, before the 2021 change, grievance activity for first- and second-step matters was generally on the order of about 10–12 cases in higher years. Supporters argued that restoring early-step grievance rights would provide workers with due process and help retention in a competitive labor market; opponents cautioned that elevating warnings into a formal grievance process could deter managers from using informal corrective tools and divert staff time.
Powell said a joint labor–management training with the University of Iowa Labor Center is scheduled for Oct. 7 to help managers and stewards understand the process and reduce administrative friction if the MOU is implemented.
After discussion, a supervisor moved to approve the MOU; the motion was seconded and the board voted to approve it 2–1.
Next steps: staff and labor representatives indicated training and coordination are planned; the MOU’s effect will be limited to AFSCME‑represented bargaining units covered by the agreement until broader contract negotiations begin.
