Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Communications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Mission Viejo to correct city messaging after sidewalk vandalism; staff says marks were spray paint and cost $300 to remove
Summary
Citizens at the June 10 council meeting said a city social-media post linking vandalism to weekly protests was vague and inflammatory. City staff responded that the marks were spray paint (not chalk), that photographs exist, the removal cost exceeded $300 and that law enforcement was notified.
A cluster of residents at the Mission Viejo City Council meeting on June 10 urged the city to correct a recent social-media/newsletter post that linked a sidewalk vandalism incident to the corner where weekly protests are held.
Dolores Thompson, who described herself as a longtime resident and teacher, said the city’s public post—citing spray-painted vandalism “where regular protests take place”—lacked photographs or details and allowed readers to speculate. “This vague messaging gave the community an opportunity to overreact, to point fingers…Not knowing what was written, it’s hard to even speculate how a person at the federal level could be targeted with chalk, which seems an obvious overdramatization,” Thompson said during public comment.
Mary Carlson and other speakers at the meeting said they had observed no vandalism and accused the post of unfairly implying that demonstrators who rally on La Paz and Marguerite were responsible. “So far, we've not been shown any evidence of the vandalism,” Carlson said, asking the council to stop spreading implications without proof.
The mayor paused public comment and asked staff to report. A city spokesperson told the council the marking was spray paint, not chalk, and that staff has photographs and identified the location. Staff said the city treated the marking as an overt threat at the federal level, notified law enforcement, removed the paint at a cost “over $300,” and encouraged witnesses to report any information to authorities. “We did not place blame,” the staff representative said, but “we took this very seriously.”
Several residents asked for a correction or retraction of the city’s public notice if it created an inaccurate linkage to the weekly protests. Council members heard detailed complaints about the tone and specificity of the messaging and directed staff to follow up with additional information, including the photographs and the exact location of the damage, where available.
The exchange highlighted tensions between demonstrators who say they are being unfairly characterized and city officials who say they must respond promptly to potential threats to public safety.
