Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workforce Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Twin Rivers board rejects $11 million commitment for employee housing
Summary
Trustees debated a resolution to commit $11 million from a restricted capital fund for a workforce housing project; supporters called it key to staff retention while critics urged fuller board input. The motion to adopt the commitment failed on a 3–2 roll call vote.
The Twin Rivers Unified School District board on Wednesday declined to commit $11,000,000 in restricted capital-outlay funds to a proposed workforce-housing project. The proposed resolution (No. 1431) would have dedicated Fund 40 dollars — a reserve restricted to facility projects — to advance design and feasibility for an employee-rental development at 1251 Chuckwagon Avenue.
Supporters argued the funding was appropriate and time-sensitive. "By utilizing Fund 40 moneys, we are adhering to the guidelines set forth in education code section 42840 and section 17462," Trustee Ocara said, adding the project could help recruit and retain staff by offering housing at an estimated 20% discount to current market rates. Superintendent Martinez and other trustees highlighted long-term benefits, including shorter commutes and increased stability for employees.
Opponents said the commitment was too large to adopt without broader board participation and more detailed briefing. "This is a fairly significant amount of money and somewhat uncertainties lie ahead of us," Trustee Voigt said, urging the board to hear from absent members before taking final action. One trustee asked whether the item could be tabled for more discussion; the board proceeded to a roll call vote instead.
The motion, made by Trustee O'Cara and seconded by Trustee Bastian, failed on roll call; the clerk recorded two Ayes and three Noes and announced the motion "denied." Board members said the item can be brought back for consideration at a future meeting after a feasibility study and further deliberation.
Next steps: staff told the board it expects a feasibility report by the end of the month and that the proposal could return to the board for additional consideration once details and timelines are clearer.
