Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Madison County approves Mapes zoning change, denies Roney; Cottonwood Creek subdivision tabled
Summary
The Madison County Board of Supervisors approved a zoning change for Sam Mapes, denied a separate rezoning request from Stephen Roney citing infrastructure concerns, and tabled the Cottonwood Creek six‑lot subdivision to allow staff and Planning & Zoning to address driveway and conservation questions.
The Madison County Board of Supervisors on July 22 approved a request to rezone a small parcel adjoining Sam’s Upholstery from agricultural to commercial but rejected a larger rezoning application and delayed action on a six‑lot subdivision.
Ryan Hillard, the county zoning administrator, told the board Sam Mapes is requesting that approximately 3 acres adjoining a parcel rezoned in December 2024 be converted from Agricultural to Commercial so Mapes can expand his restoration business. Hillard said staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval, noting the parcel fronts a paved state highway and that adjacent Parcel A had been rezoned earlier this year.
After public comment in support from contract buyer Steven Brownie and the sellers’ realtor, the supervisors voted to approve the Mapes zoning change.
By contrast, Hillard recommended denial of an 8.32‑acre rezoning request by Stephen Roney. County engineering comments cited the unpaved road access, existing truck traffic on Warren Avenue, the lack of on‑ and off‑ramps for Veterans Parkway and concerns about a proposed 40,000‑square‑foot warehouse relying on a private septic system. Hillard said Planning & Zoning recommended denial by a 4–1 vote. The Board ultimately voted not to approve the Roney rezoning, citing infrastructure and traffic concerns.
A final‑plat request for the Cottonwood Creek subdivision — a proposal by Benjamin Kelly to divide roughly 30.18 acres into six lots on Hogback Ridge Road — drew extended testimony and competing technical points. Kelly and his attorney, Trevor Swinehoos, argued the plat conforms to applicable statutes and ordinances and pointed to prior preliminary approval and nearby approved subdivisions. Swinehoos cited Iowa Code 354.8, which requires approval if a plat complies with controlling law at the time of submission.
Conservation staff and public speakers raised concerns about grassland loss, steep slopes and potential remnant prairie habitat; county staff cited soil and septic limitations (CSR2 ~55.96) and driveways/road impacts. After debate over driveway configurations and the differing Planning & Zoning votes on preliminary and final plats, the board rescinded an initial motion and voted to table Cottonwood Creek so staff and Planning & Zoning can revisit engineering/flood/driveway and conservation documentation.
The board instructed staff to coordinate with the zoning administrator and the conservation board, and noted no additional public hearing was required because a public hearing had been held. If outstanding issues are resolved, the item can be returned for final action; otherwise the applicant can reapply or the board can deny the request at a later date.
