Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit And Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
FJUHSD receives clean audit for FY23–24; board adopts 2025–26 textbook list and approves consent calendar
Summary
CliftonLarsonAllen reported an unmodified opinion on the district's FY23–24 financial statements and a clean Measure I performance audit. The board approved a revised child development textbook list for 2025–26 (4–0) and approved the consent calendar (4–0).
Fullerton Joint Union High School District trustees received the FY23–24 audit and performance reports and took two routine votes.
Representatives from CliftonLarsonAllen, including the auditor presenting to the board, reported an unmodified (clean) opinion on the district’s financial statements for fiscal year 2023–24 and said there were no current‑year findings that would affect the financial report. The auditors also reported no reportable noncompliance or significant deficiencies in internal control in the major federal and state programs they tested, and said the Measure I performance audit returned no reportable items. "On page 1, we have issued an unmodified opinion," the auditor said during the presentation.
Assistant Superintendent Ruben Hernandez told trustees the audit had been completed in accordance with Education Code requirements and that the audit reports were submitted to the County Office of Education and state agencies and met the statutory deadline.
On motions from the floor, the board adopted the proposed additions to the district's basic textbook list for child development for the 2025–26 school year. The motion to adopt was moved and seconded during the meeting; the board vote was recorded as 4–0 in favor. The record does not specify which trustees made the motion and second on the transcript; the board approved the action with a recorded vote of 4–0.
The board also approved the consent calendar by a 4–0 vote after brief public comment; no specific roll call detail for individual trustee votes beyond the reported 4–0 tally was provided in the transcript.
CliftonLarsonAllen auditors who presented the report (including Gemma Pashinski and Jonathan Pena) emphasized that while the auditors form an opinion on the financial statements, other sections of the report (for example, management discussion and some supplementary schedules) are outside the audit opinion and are prepared by district management. The auditors noted one post‑closing entry related to workers’ compensation adjustments but said there were no adjustments to the financial statements that changed the unaudited actuals presented earlier.
The board received the audit and performance reports and took the two approvals; no additional board action was required for the audit beyond acknowledgment and receipt of the report.
