Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press Fountain Valley council for stronger enforcement of sober-living homes; town hall scheduled
Summary
Dozens of residents told the council sober-living homes are causing neighborhood problems, alleging frequent turnover, noise, vehicle congestion and safety incidents; council invited speakers to a town hall on April 3 and staff pointed to the citys ordinance and code-enforcement contact info.
A sustained string of public comments at the March 18 meeting focused on the citys sober-living houses, with multiple residents describing neighborhood impacts and urging the council to act.
Maribeth Goldsby and other speakers praised the sober-living ordinances intent but urged amendments and stricter enforcement, calling for limits on the number and concentration of homes in residential neighborhoods. Bill Martin, who said he lives next to a sober residence, described repeated turnover of residents and said his family feels unsafe; he and others urged the council not to be deterred by potential lawsuits.
Several speakers cited specific local impacts: parking and vans blocking streets, loud music, people loitering, police and ambulance calls, and alleged drug use at some properties. One commenter said the city had 35 such homes when the last ordinance passed and now had about 83, reflecting rapid growth that neighbors say was not well communicated.
A sober-living resident and recovery advocate, Ronnie Guerrero, urged nuance and said many sober-living homes are run well and provide medical and counseling supports that helped him recover; he asked the council to recognize successful programs while addressing illegal or poorly run operators.
Councilmembers acknowledged the concerns and reminded residents that because the comments were unscheduled, council could not respond in detail at that moment. The city clerk and city attorney noted the code-enforcement phone number and webpage are publicly available for complaints; staff and council encouraged residents to attend a scheduled town-hall meeting on April 3 at the Recreation Center to continue the conversation.
Next steps: city staff will present responses and take questions at a public town-hall on April 3 (Recreation Center, 10200 Slater Avenue). The code-enforcement phone number was posted publicly (city website) and residents were asked to use that channel to report violations.
