Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Local officials debate HB 1043 and ambulance funding; commission urged to verify legislative record before public statements
Summary
Commissioners heard a presentation on HB 1043 (attempt to designate ambulance/EMS services as essential and add court-fee revenue); the session included disputed characterizations of how local legislators voted and calls for accurate public statements and lobbying coordination.
Members of the public and a legislative representative addressed the county commission Aug. 5 about House Bill 1043, a proposal that would (by the representative's account) add a $5 court-fee surcharge to certain fines and a $1 million state appropriation intended to support ambulance services, and would designate ambulance/EMS services as an essential public service.
A presenter who identified herself as serving on the House Local Government committee and as vice chair described the bill's objectives and criticized opposition from some lobbyists. During the exchange, commissioners and other participants asked where an oft-cited estimate of a $250,000-to-$800,000 county funding "loss" came from; the presenter said the county bears that cost. She also read a packeted letter from Representative Eric Emery, the bill's author, urging support.
A tension in the meeting arose over a public statement by a county official that two area legislators had voted against the bill; the presenter said that characterization misrepresented how she voted and asked the chairman to consult the legislative record before making public claims. The presenter supplied meeting materials and asked for accurate, credible public statements.
During public comment, State Senator Lauren Nelson told the commission the bill died in the House appropriations committee and clarified that as a senator she did not vote on the house action; she also urged the county to move quickly on the earlier road safety complaint if it posed an imminent hazard.
The commission did not pass a formal resolution on HB 1043 at the meeting but discussed encouraging its lobbyist and regional partners to re-examine the bill's funding mechanisms and to work with municipal leaders to find a local solution.
