Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents accuse mayor of suppressing public comment; neighbors warn of water-main issues tied to proposed Rochester project

Royal Oak Planning Commission · May 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

During public comment, Trish Oliver accused the mayor and commission of suppressing free speech at a prior meeting by calling repeated recesses; Thomas Horman warned that a proposed 42-unit project at 4704 Rochester Road could double utility load on Genesee Avenue, citing recent water-main breaks.

Public-comment speakers raised two distinct concerns at the start of the meeting: allegations about how the city handles public participation and technical warnings about neighborhood infrastructure.

Trish Oliver, a Royal Oak resident since 1986, said the mayor and commission used back‑to‑back recesses at an April 28 meeting to disperse attendees and scold those who applauded, arguing those actions chilled speech. Oliver said the First Amendment protects expressive conduct like clapping and urged the commission to stop ‘‘intimidating your own citizens.’’ Her remarks included a call for a new administration she said would listen to residents.

Thomas Horman (resident, 914 Genesee Avenue) raised infrastructure concerns tied to a rezoning at 4704 Rochester Road. Horman said the Genesee Avenue stretch already serves 42 dwelling units and that the proposed project would add 42 more, potentially doubling load on water and sewer infrastructure. He described at least three water-main breaks over the past 10 years on a 10-inch water main, including two recent breaks and an incident on May 7 that required Consumers Energy to repair a cut gas line before public works could finish. Horman asked the commission to consider infrastructure adequacy in rezoning and development decisions.

Commissioners did not take action on either allegation during the meeting; the public-comment items were heard and recorded as part of the meeting minutes.