Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Enrollment And Reconfiguration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Carmel school leaders outline enrollment decline, consider Princeton model and fifth-grade reconfiguration
Summary
District officials presented a long-range enrollment study projecting a 4.7% drop (172 students) by 2033, proposed a fifth-grade "school-within-a-school" at George Fisher as a near-term option and examined a Princeton-style redistricting that staff say would require nine extra buses and 19 new drivers.
Superintendent opened the Board of Education—work session by presenting a district enrollment study showing a sustained decline and a projection the district will lose 172 students (4.7%) by 2033, with the bulk of the decline concentrated in the high school grades.
The superintendent said enrollment losses over the past decade reflect shifting birthrates, housing turnover and nonpublic-school factors and noted grade-by-grade projections that show the high school could lose about 148 students (11.2%) while elementary and middle grades decline less sharply. "Fifth grade is young to be in a middle school," the superintendent said, arguing the district should prioritize a developmental model for fifth graders.
To address space and instructional continuity, the superintendent proposed creating a George Fisher Elementary Academy (a "school within a school") to house fifth graders in an elementary-style environment while preserving elementary bus routing and schedules. She cautioned the board about implementation risk: "We are literally at the point where we can do it, but any more children, and we will be in a situation where we'll have to undo what we did."
The presentation also reviewed the Princeton-model approach to redistricting (a districtwide balancing of enrollments across schools). Staff reported that current subgroup distributions are relatively balanced across Matthew Patterson, Kent Primary and Kent Elementary, reducing the equity imperative for immediate redistricting. The superintendent said operational analyses show the Princeton model—would not dramatically reduce instructional staff and estimated a reduction of roughly three teachers under one implementation scenario.
Staff flagged significant transportation implications: after running the numbers with the transportation supervisor, they estimated a Princeton-style redistricting could require nine additional buses and 19 new drivers. The superintendent told trustees that, given regional bus-driver shortages and contractual class-size and room constraints, the board should consider staged community engagement and thorough facilities mapping before moving forward.
Trustees repeatedly asked for facility maps and the facility study that underpins the recommendations. The superintendent said the board would need to petition the State Education Department (SED) by March 1 to change certain school classifications in time for a 2026—implementation cycle, and recommended robust shared-decision-making, community focus groups and site visits before any reconfiguration.
Board next steps: staff will circulate the facility maps and the enrollment/facilities reports, continue shared-decision-making meetings and schedule community engagement and site visits; trustees indicated they expect continued discussion in budget and future work sessions.
