Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the QEM topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Quality Education Commission outlines QEM approach; lawmakers press for more detail
Summary
Tricia Mooney, chair of the Quality Education Commission, told the joint committee the QEM is a professional-judgment costing model based on prototype schools; lawmakers pressed the commission for more granular data, clearer measures of sufficiency and inclusion of special education, CTE and district weighting in the next report due after sine die.
Tricia Mooney, chair of the Quality Education Commission, presented the commission’s approach to estimating the cost of a sufficient K–12 education under the constitutional requirement enacted by Ballot Measure 1 and Article VIII, Section 8.
Mooney told the committee the commission’s work uses a Quality Education Model (QEM) driven by professional judgment, prototype schools (elementary, middle, high) and best practices drawn from research and state examples. Mooney said the model is intended to identify the inputs required to meet statutory education goals and noted the QEC will provide appendices and supporting materials with costing details.
Committee members challenged the commission’s level of specificity. Multiple members said the prototype descriptions read as an aspirational "perfect world" and pressed for measurable goals, inclusion and costing of special education, clearer documentation of assumptions (for example staffing and administrative positions not shown on front slides), and more prototype or weighting options to reflect Oregon’s rural/urban diversity. One lawmaker argued the model’s public presentation had removed detail respondents previously used for analysis and urged the commission to restore or make available supporting appendices; Mooney said the appendices and costing details exist and the commission would work to make them clearer for the next report.
Mooney also summarized procedural items: the QEC is an 11-member commission appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate; the Legislature may use the QEC determination or an alternative methodology; and the joint committee must publish the required report within 180 days after sine die (deadline discussed as Dec. 24).
Next steps: the commission will provide additional documentation and consider broadening prototype options and weighting approaches; the committee scheduled Oct. 22 for a presentation on the draft report and public testimony and Nov. 19 for a possible adoption vote if the committee approves the report.
