Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning commission approves front‑yard special use permit for garage at 8751 Cascade Road

Cascade Charter Township Planning Commission · August 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Cascade Charter Township Planning Commission approved a Type 1 special use permit allowing a larger detached garage to replace an existing shed at 8751 Cascade Road, conditioned on a zoning variance (or plan revision), a prohibition on accessory-dwelling use, and shielded outdoor lighting.

Cascade Charter Township’s Planning Commission on July 7 approved a Type 1 special use permit allowing a replacement detached garage to remain in the front yard at 8751 Cascade Road SE, contingent on a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals or revised plans to meet the 50‑foot setback.

The commission heard a staff report explaining the parcel is a corner lot with frontage on Cascade Road and Quiggle Avenue, a stream and a pond across the middle of the property, and an existing 280‑square‑foot detached structure that staff classified as a legal nonconforming building in the front yard. Staff said the new structure would have a 552‑square‑foot footprint (795 square feet overall building area) and include attic storage; it remains below the ordinance’s 832‑square‑foot floor‑area maximum and the proposed midpoint height is about 16.5 feet (the 22‑foot midpoint limit was cited as the maximum). The parcel’s required front setback from Cascade Road in the applicable zone is 50 feet; staff reported the proposed placement is roughly 36 feet from that right‑of‑way and therefore does not meet the standard.

Applicant testimony and staff presentations emphasized topography, wetlands and septic placement as constraints. The applicant (Speaker 6) said the lot’s stream, pond and septic lift station limit feasible locations for a rear or side‑yard garage and described the existing accessory building as deteriorated. Staff said one of the allowed pathways under section 17‑0‑3‑1‑b of the township zoning ordinance is showing that topography or site conditions make rear/side placement impractical; staff advised the commission the application met at least one of those criteria based on the site features and the presence of wetland soils.

Commissioners asked detailed questions about elevations, the garage door orientation and intended use. The applicant said the new structure would be two stalls with storage above, would match the house siding and color, would have electricity but no water, and would not be finished as habitable living space "so we could put access that to use for storage" (Applicant, Speaker 6). Commissioners expressed concern about potential future conversion to a rental or accessory dwelling; the approved motion includes an explicit condition that the accessory building "shall not be used as a home occupation or accessory dwelling unit."

The Planning Commission’s motion also conditions approval on the applicant obtaining a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals to encroach into the 50‑foot setback for Cascade Road or else revising plans to meet setback requirements. The motion added an outdoor‑lighting condition requiring fixtures to be shielded or downcast in accordance with Cascade Township standards. The motion, read into the record by Speaker 2, passed on a voice vote.

What happens next: the applicant must seek the variance from the ZBA at its September meeting or revise plans to meet the setback standard; the planning commission’s approval is conditioned on that outcome. If the ZBA denies a variance, the applicant may revise the plans to move the structure to comply without returning to the planning commission, per staff’s explanation of the recommended motion.

The decision does not authorize any plumbing or living‑space conversion; the commission’s recorded conditions limit future use to storage and forbid accessory dwelling or home‑occupation uses. The matter concluded with commissioners and staff noting the structure as proposed would be more conforming than the existing building in its current condition.