Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Trustees split on neighborhood streetlights; two requests fail amid concerns about local support and permanence

Cascade Charter Township Board of Trustees · March 27, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board considered two Consumers Energy streetlight requests (Colchester & Thorncrest; Whitneyville & Lily Ridge). Trustees questioned the number and origin of supporting letters, homeowner costs and permanence; the Colchester motion failed after roll call and the Whitneyville request was not authorized.

Cascade Charter Township trustees considered two separate resident requests to add overhead streetlights under Consumers Energy's standard lighting contract but did not authorize either.

For Colchester Drive and Thorncrest Drive, staff reported roughly a dozen notices sent to nearby homes and said Consumers Energy would charge a $100 authorization fee and about $17 per month per light (roughly $204 annually), with part of that cost typically assessed to nearby properties. The requesting resident was said to be local, but trustees noted the one letter of support in the record listed a Florida mailing address. "If your letterhead is Sarasota, Florida, you're likely wintering there," one trustee said, questioning whether the support reflected current local residents. After discussion and a roll call, the chair announced, "Motion Failed." Trustees recorded a mix of yes and no votes on the roll call.

A second request for a light on Whitneyville Avenue at Lily Ridge Drive also drew limited responses (one applicant and one opposing letter reported by staff). Trustees pressed staff on the notice radius and the length of time residents had to respond; during the roll call the board recorded no votes in favor and did not authorize installation.

Trustees framed their skepticism around making a permanent change with limited neighborhood turnout in written responses and the difficulty of later removal: "I'm assuming it doesn't get removed for a $100," one trustee said about reversal costs. Staff noted Consumers Energy can adjust aim and lumens and that removal would be a township cost. No contract amendments or further directions were adopted; staff said they will continue to gather resident feedback and present engineering input when available.