Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Records Archive Fee topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Coryell County hears public questions about $10 county-clerk records-archive fee
Summary
The commissioners court heard questions about a proposed county-clerk records-archive fee (up to $10 per document), including whether it is per document or per page, where archived files will be stored, competitive pricing, and whether existing filing fees already cover scanning.
The commissioners court opened a public hearing on a proposed records-archive fee under cited local-government-code provisions and received multiple questions about the fee's mechanics and storage arrangements.
Presiding Officer described the proposal as a fee-based fund (not a tax) dedicated to preservation and restoration of county clerk records and said the maximum collectible amount would be $10. When asked whether the fee is per document or per page, the county clerk responded that the $10 is per document, not per page. Commenters pressed for clarity on where electronic archives will be stored, whether the county competitively priced scanning and storage services, and whether the fee duplicates existing filing fees.
A county IT-oriented commenter noted that modern optical-character-recognition tools can reduce labor after initial configuration and asked how the county would handle costs if archive-storage demand exceeded revenue from the $10-per-document fee. Some speakers suggested the county should publish contract details and comparative pricing to demonstrate competitive procurement.
The court closed the public hearing on the records-archive fee and moved the item to agenda discussion; no final adoption was recorded during the session.
Next steps: staff indicated they would address detailed questions at a later agenda item and the county clerk or staff were asked to provide contract details and storage-location information for public review.
