Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
La Porte County residents urge study of courthouse stained-glass; commissioners decline immediate study amid budget concerns
Summary
Residents presented expert findings that La Porte County Courthouse stained-glass windows are valuable and deteriorating and requested a $3,000–$15,000 condition study; commissioners debated timing and voted with a 1–2 voice split against immediately soliciting proposals pending budget outcome.
Resident researcher Lee Morris told the La Porte County Board of Commissioners the courthouse’s stained-glass windows are “an extremely valuable and remarkable collection” and reported that inspection by firms from Fort Wayne and Chicago found deterioration, cracked glass, rotted frames and gaps that need maintenance. He asked the board to authorize solicitation of proposals for a photographic inventory, condition assessment and a prioritized 10‑year maintenance plan, estimating the study at roughly $3,000 to $15,000, likely toward the lower end.
A department head reiterated support for issuing a solicitation to include the two firms that had already inspected the windows. The motion to solicit proposals was moved and seconded, and commissioners discussed whether the county should spend funds for a study during ongoing budget hearings.
One commissioner said the study could be wasted if the County Council refuses to provide funding after the study is completed. Board members also pressed staff on other facility priorities: restroom repairs in the Heiler building that require engineering and state approval to meet ADA requirements, and leaking jail showers that are under review by an engineering firm. Staff said a contractor could fix both bathrooms for $40,000 but that engineering approval may be required.
On a voice vote the motion to solicit proposals recorded one affirmative response and two negatives, leaving the solicitation unapproved at the meeting.
The discussion concluded with commissioners suggesting alternatives such as historical-society fundraising or postponing action until the budget process clarifies available funds. No formal obligation to fund the study was created at the meeting; next steps were left contingent on budget decisions and possible outside fundraising.
