Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District outlines high special‑education costs and floated stipends to retain staff

Fountain Hills Unified School District Governing Board · February 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Superintendent detailed special-education expenses—staff salaries and outside placements—and proposed boosting hard-to-fill stipends ($5,000 for resource teachers, $15,000 for self-contained) to reduce reliance on contracted agencies and stabilize services.

Fountain Hills Unified School District leaders told the governing board Tuesday that special-education costs are a major pressure on next year’s operating budget and presented a plan to increase retention pay for in‑district special-education teachers.

The figures: The superintendent described total salaries and benefits for district special-education staff as about $1,660,000 and cited tuition and contracted transportation costs for outside placements as a major additional expense. Staff said contracted placements and services can be volatile and costly for a small district and that some contracted providers conceal teacher pay rates.

Proposed retention pay: To reduce turnover and the district’s reliance on third‑party contracted teachers, staff proposed two stipend increases: an additional $5,000 per year for resource special‑education teachers and a $15,000 stipend for self‑contained teachers. District staff estimated the total recurring M&O cost of that package at roughly $65,000 annually, and said that investment could be offset in part by securing higher state reimbursements for high‑cost students.

Rationale and reactions: Board members expressed concern about fairness and asked whether other teachers would feel overlooked; staff said they had taken the proposal to meet-and-confer and that teachers supported directing pay to retention of difficult-to-fill special-education roles. Members asked staff to return with precise cost and funding-source breakdowns before any vote.

Next steps: The proposal was offered for discussion and will be refined with input from HR, finance and meet-and-confer before a future decision. Staff said they will also continue pursuing state and county reimbursements for high‑cost placements.