Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spring Hill updates neighborhood traffic‑calming program, emphasizing education and enforcement
Summary
The board approved an amended neighborhood traffic‑calming program that puts education and enforcement at the front end, directs PD speed‑trailer data collection, and adjusts scoring criteria to reduce staff time spent on evaluations; resolution passed 9–0.
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Mayor and Aldermen approved a rewrite of the neighborhood traffic‑calming program on Sept. 2 intended to reduce unnecessary staff time and rely first on education and targeted enforcement. Gerald Bolden of the Cardino Group summarized the changes: once a request is received it now goes first to the Spring Hill Police Department for speed‑trailer data collection; if speeds do not reduce, the matter can progress to public works and the original petition process. The scoring criteria were adjusted to make qualification more practicable and to prevent excessive staff time spent on petitions that ultimately fail to meet program thresholds.
Board members asked about how requesters and HOAs will be kept informed of progress (Bolden said requesters will be kept in the loop through coordination but not necessarily notified at every minor step), and whether exceptions exist to a two‑year ineligibility after step‑5 (staff said there are exceptions for new roadway connections or significant changes in travel patterns). TAC had recommended the rewrite favorably; the board passed Resolution 25‑210 by a 9–0 vote.
The revised flowchart and scoring changes aim to prioritize lower‑cost methods (education and enforcement) before initiating petitions and capital design work.
