Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Peculiar aldermen debate inconsistent residential speed limits, call for signage and neighborhood survey
Summary
Alderman Jarrett urged the board to standardize residential speed limits after finding 15- and 25-mph zones without consistent signage; police said enforcement is limited and the department deploys a radar trailer intermittently. Aldermen volunteered to survey neighborhoods for targeted action.
Alderman Jarrett opened a council discussion on Sept. 29, saying a review of the city’s traffic code showed inconsistent residential speed limits and varying signage across developments. “There are speed limits from 15 to 25 miles an hour, some posted, some not posted,” Jarrett said, arguing the council should pursue consistency and post limits so drivers are not left guessing.
Several aldermen described neighborhoods where adjacent subdivisions have different posted limits and said that mismatch undermines public understanding of the rule. One alderman who lives on a 15-mph street said consistency matters even if changing limits may not stop all speeders.
Police staff told the board that neighborhood speeding complaints are the department’s most frequent citizen concern and noted the department’s limited enforcement resources. “The number one complaint the police department gets … is people speeding in neighborhoods,” the chief said, and staff added the department deploys its radar trailer roughly six times per year to increase awareness.
Concerns at the meeting included whether lowering limits to 15 mph everywhere would be enforceable, how electric bicycles or faster carts would fit into lower limits, and the cost of installing and maintaining additional signs. A ward alderman said his constituents opposed allowing utility vehicles and golf carts on many local roads; another member emphasized the legal distinction between private and public streets when discussing earlier examples.
Without a formal vote, aldermen agreed to gather more information. Multiple members volunteered to partner with Alderman Jarrett on a field survey of streets to map current posted limits and problem locations; staff will also provide existing Title 3 code sections for review. The discussion closed with a call for clearer signage where speed limits are ambiguous.
The item will return to a future meeting once the board compiles the neighborhood review and staff provides cost estimates for signage and enforcement implications.
