Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pickleball Cup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Poquoson council approves private pickleball court at 8 Rochambeau Drive with strict conditions
Summary
After months of review and neighbor comment, Poquoson City Council approved a conditional use permit for a private pickleball court at 8 Rochambeau Drive, imposing 10 conditions including hours (8 a.m.–8 p.m.), screening with at least seven holly trees, color-matching the court and a ban on an observation deck; the motion passed 6-1.
Poquoson City Council voted 6-1 to approve a conditional use permit allowing a private pickleball court at 8 Rochambeau Drive, imposing conditions intended to limit noise, light spill and public use.
The decision follows months of review by staff and the planning commission and public comment at the council meeting. The counciladded or confirmed 10 conditions that require the court to be private, limit hours to 8 a.m. to 8 p.m., require screening (a minimum of seven needlepoint holly trees with at least 10-foot spread), concentrate lighting on the court with no spillover, paint the surface a "green grass" color with minimal contrast, and expressly forbid construction of an observation deck.
Opponents and proponents made competing appeals to neighborhood character. "We will stop decorating at Christmas and only put lights on the house ... as long as you go along with us and disapprove this tonight," resident Robert Small told the council, urging denial and saying four adjacent neighbors opposed the proposal. The applicant's representative, Kim Shaw, said the request is a private homeowner "want" meant for family use and said some neighbors who border the property support the project.
City staff and council members debated precedent and enforcement. Wiley Horton, the director of community development, described the CUP conditions and legal mechanics, including that conditional use permits generally run with the land unless the council sets a time limit. Council members questioned whether allowing a front-yard court would create a template for similar future requests; several members said conditions and councilreview powers provide enforcement options.
Council took a final, recorded vote with the following responses: Councilman Southall, Aye; Councilman Freeman, Aye; Councilwoman Hubbard, Aye; Vice Mayor Bunting, Aye; Councilman Fye, No; Councilwoman Emmett, Aye; Mayor Hooks, Aye. The motion carried by a vote of 6 to 1.
The permit includes a provision that the city may revoke the CUP if the use violates the listed conditions or applicable local, state or federal permits. Council preserved the right to revisit or amend conditions in the future.
The resolution and conditions adopted by the council require the applicant to submit plans complying with city code, maintain and replace screening vegetation when removed, keep the court private (no commercial or competitive events), and follow required permits and inspections. The permit is limited to the court and associated lighting and does not authorize an observation deck.
Council members said the decision was an attempt at compromise: allow the homeowner private use while adding protections and review mechanisms to address neighbors' concerns.
