Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Brooklyn Park budget preview: staff outlines assumptions, council signals desire to limit levy increase

Brooklyn Park City Council · September 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff outlined preliminary 2026 budget drivers — COLA, health insurance increases, new positions, and proposed debt for a fire station — producing a draft levy increase near 12.5% before policy choices; several council members said they prefer keeping any levy under 10%, with many favoring 8–9%.

Finance Director Latonya Green presented a preliminary look at the 2026 budget and asked the council for guidance on an acceptable levy target.

Director Green listed key drivers: estimated cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) of about 3%, step increases, a projected 17.4% increase in health insurance costs, recently authorized firefighter positions, ongoing chargeback increases for fleet/IT, and debt service tied to a proposed fire station. Green included a working assumption of roughly $22.75 million in bond issuance related to capital needs, and said the total preliminary levy increase calculated from those assumptions was about 12.5%.

Council members reacted cautiously. Several said they understand the city’s service needs but urged restraint: a number of council members said they want any proposed levy increase to stay under 10% (several suggested 8–9% or even closer to 7%). Council directed staff to return with departmental scenarios that show service‑level reductions and options to reach lower levy targets, and asked for clearer, resident-facing communications that explain the components of the tax bill (city versus county/school shares).

Director Green also noted a HUD pass‑through grant of approximately $4 million that would offset some bonding for a listed project; she cautioned that capital and debt‑service timing will affect the first levy impact year.

Next steps: staff will prepare trimmed budget scenarios corresponding to council target ranges, provide department-level reduction options, and return with clearer levy breakouts and resident communications ahead of certificiation deadlines.