Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transit topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Raytown hears KCATA IRIS ridership and explores fixed-route extension ahead of FIFA

Raytown Board of Aldermen · June 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

KCATA officials reported 1,838 IRIS riders through May 31 and proposed a 14-month renewal plus a possible Route 63 fixed-route extension into Raytown to ensure reliable service during FIFA 2026 and to strengthen grant competitiveness.

A KCATA representative updated the Board of Aldermen on the IRIS on-demand service on June 17, reporting 1,838 riders through May 31 and that 86% of reservations have been made in the app. The presenter said typical walking distance to pick-up was no greater than a quarter-mile and hours of operation were 6 a.m. to 10 p.m.

Staff proposed negotiating a 14-month contract extension through the FIFA 2026 period rather than the standard 12 months to ensure available vehicles during increased demand. KCATA staff also proposed, for consideration, a separate 14-month fixed-route extension of Route 63 into Raytown to provide a reliable, seven-days-a-week option that could better support workers commuting to downtown and strengthen the city’s position when applying for federal infrastructure grants.

The presenter acknowledged service reliability issues tied to double-bookings and occasional cancellations; average reported wait time and average ride time were described as acceptable in current data but staff said they would follow up with more detailed cancellation/wait-time metrics before returning with contract language and cost estimates. Alderwoman Hayden and others asked whether a terminating Kansas City decision could end IRIS and whether Raytown would have a contingency plan; staff said they would notify the board immediately and develop a local plan if Kansas City scaled back participation.

No contract extension vote occurred June 17; staff said proposed contract(s) would be returned on July 1 for Board consideration with recommended annual fee and additional cost details.