Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rural Event Venues topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Powhatan planning staff to advertise changes for rural event venues after commissioners seek limits on sound, size and overnight stays
Summary
The Powhatan Planning Commission agreed to advertise proposed changes to rural event-venue rules for the Sept. 2 meeting after members flagged notice issues and sought clearer limits on amplified sound, building size by acreage and overnight accommodations.
The Powhatan Planning Commission on May opened discussion of a referral from the Board of Supervisors to consider changes to county rules for rural event venues and agreed to advertise the item for the commission’s Sept. 2 meeting.
Staff member (S3) said the referral grew from two landowner inquiries and would keep the 10-acre minimum for rural venues while allowing possible flexibility in several specific conditions. “We did not send the adjacent notices to the folks in the AFD,” S3 said in explanation for delaying the hearings and for taking more time to draft clearer language.
Commissioners focused on three substantive points: maximum building size tied to parcel acreage, amplified sound, and provisions for overnight accommodations. One commissioner (S4) summarized a proposed sizing approach as an increase of 2,500 square feet of building area per 10 acres, noting that “if you go to 20 acres, you can go to 5,000.” Commissioners asked staff to confirm the intended formula and how it would scale with larger parcels.
On sound, commissioners discussed setting conditions such as decibel limits and allowable hours, at least for events that use amplified music outdoors. Regarding overnight stays, a commissioner asked whether the draft language would permit motel-style operations open to the general public; S3 said the intent is that overnight accommodations be accessory to the venue use (for event guests) and not operate as standalone short‑term rental businesses.
Staff and commissioners also clarified zoning terminology in the draft (a typographical reference to “R R 5” appeared in the packet and was identified as an error); S3 said the intent was to address rural residential (RR) districts with the 10‑acre minimum.
S3 said existing Conditional Use Permit (CUP) holders who wanted to change their approved conditions would need to apply for amendments on a case‑by‑case basis; the commission discussed recent examples such as Fine Creek and Crossroads as local context for how those processes have been handled.
No vote was taken on the substance. Staff said it will prepare clearer draft language, will consult with commissioners before September, and will advertise the item for the Sept. 2 meeting for further public review and deliberation.
