Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves 20‑unit assisted‑living facility at 1744 County Road D E

Maplewood City Council · February 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Maplewood City Council on Feb. 10 approved a conditional‑use permit amendment and design review for a 20‑unit assisted‑living facility proposed by MX Real Estate at 1744 County Road D E; staff said neighbors within 500 feet were notified and no comments were received.

The Maplewood City Council on Feb. 10 voted to approve a conditional‑use permit amendment and a design‑review resolution allowing MX Real Estate to build a 20‑unit residential assisted‑living facility at 1744 County Road D E.

Planner Danette Parr presented the project and said it is largely unchanged from a prior approval that lapsed in May 2024. Parr told the council the site meets parking and design criteria, that a future west‑side addition would require a separate return to the council, and that staff notified property owners within 500 feet and received no comments. "We did notify within 500 feet. We had no comments," Parr said during her presentation.

Mycia, the applicant, spoke briefly and offered no additional changes. Council members asked about landscaping and screening; Councilmember Juniman noted additional screening for the generator, transformer and trash enclosure, and Parr confirmed the applicant had been informed of those requirements.

Councilmember Lee moved and Councilmember Cave seconded approval of the conditional‑use permit amendment; the motion carried by voice vote. Council then approved the design‑review resolution in a separate motion, again carried by voice vote.

The approvals allow the applicant to proceed toward building permits, subject to the conditions of approval noted in staff materials. Parr said the project is part of the site’s larger planned unit development and that future phases would return to the council if proposed.