Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board deadlocks on superintendent contract addendum after amendment attempt fails
Summary
Trustees debated a superintendent contract addendum that included a 2% base raise, flex days and vacation adjustments; an amendment failed on a tie and the original motion failed 3–3.
Get email alerts on the Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After an executive session to discuss the superintendent’s contract, the board debated and voted on a proposed contract addendum that would have adjusted salary and benefits. Speaker 5 moved to approve the superintendent contract addendum for salary and benefits; Speaker 3 proposed a modification limiting a proposed increase to a 2% raise to base pay plus five flex days to be used in June and July and striking additional vacation days. The amendment was put to a vote and failed on a tie. The original motion — read on the floor as a 2% base increase, three additional vacation days and 10 flex remote days during June and/or July — subsequently failed on a 3–3 vote.
Board chair Speaker 1 emphasized the vote was not a reflection of performance: “There is nothing wrong with Mister Weigel's performance. We're very pleased with your performance,” the chair said during discussion. Trustees expressed frustration about timing and attendance; several members urged the board to revisit the issue at a future meeting and to address member attendance before deciding compensation changes.
Because the motion failed on a tie, no contract addendum was approved; board members indicated they will place the matter back on a future agenda to resolve outstanding issues, including absences and clearer advance notice of proposed contract language.

