Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District demonstrates integrated safety system and moves to new visitor-management platform
Summary
The Platte County School District #1 demonstrated a district-wide audio-enhancement safety system that can map alerts, intercom into classrooms and notify dispatch; the board also approved replacement of its visitor-management system with Raptor and discussed implementation timelines and workflows.
Platte County School District #1 staff demonstrated plans to use existing audio-enhancement equipment together with a district-level "district view" to speed response to in-school emergencies and to replace the districts visitor-management software with Raptor.
"The whole idea behind it was for enhancing the classroom," Speaker 6 said in a presentation on the districts safety setup, describing lanyard-triggered alerts, an audible alarm in classrooms and a map-based dashboard that shows which room has an incident. The system also allows an administrator or dispatcher to intercom into a specific room and to program lockdown and escalate buttons to notify law enforcement.
Speaker 6 emphasized the integration potential with the county dispatch center: "So we could allow dispatch to have their own login and their own insight into what the schools are seeing," he said, adding that dispatch could route responding officers with room-level information to reduce response times.
On visitor management, Speaker 6 said the district will replace its previous system with Raptor. He described features that include preverification via a smartphone app, QR-code check-in, printed photo badges, and automated checks against offender databases and PowerSchool custom alerts. "The passes will have their picture and name when they checked in," Speaker 6 said, noting that much of the necessary equipment is already in place and that the change largely requires software configuration and licensing.
Board members asked about workflow, SRO notification and whether alerts would go to mobile SROs. Speaker 6 said the system can be set to text an SRO and that the district and law enforcement will need to formalize response checklists. The board discussed timing and costs: staff said much of the hardware existed and that implementation primarily requires licensing and administrative setup.
Next steps: staff said they will continue implementation planning, define checklists and rollout schedules, and return with procedural steps for how dispatch and SROs will be notified during an incident.
(Reporting note: quotes and descriptions above are drawn from the board meeting presentation and Q&A.)
