Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Orange County board enters closed session to discuss administrator search, economic development, broadband bargaining, litigation and audit contract
Summary
The Orange County board voted unanimously to enter closed session under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act to discuss a prospective county administrator, a potential business expansion, broadband investment bargaining, planning-and-zoning litigation consultation, and terms for an audit services contract; the board later certified the closed meeting and adjourned to its regular session.
Orange County board members voted unanimously to enter a closed session after a staff member read exemptions under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act that allow private discussion of certain personnel, economic development and contract matters.
A staff member recommended "a motion to enter closed session as permitted by the Virginia Freedom of Information Act" and read the specific purposes cited in the motion: discussion of a prospective candidate for county administrator, discussion of a prospective business and expansion where no prior announcement has been made, discussion of the investment of public funds specifically related to broadband where bargaining is involved, consultation with counsel about actual or probable litigation concerning planning and zoning, and discussion of terms for a public contract for audit services. "I recommend a motion to enter closed session as permitted by the Virginia Freedom of Information Act…," the staff member stated while reading the cited statutory purposes.
Chairman Johnson moved to enter closed session "based on the county attorney's reading," and Mister Marshall seconded. The chair called for those in favor to say “Aye,” and the motion carried by voice vote. The board then recessed into closed session.
The public transcript captures informal conversation while the board was in closed session; the remarks in that span are conversational and personal in nature and do not record formal board action in public.
When the board returned to open session, Latoya asked members to certify that "only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements were discussed" and that nothing beyond what had been identified in the motion was considered. The roll call recorded affirmative responses from Miss Hale, Mister Nicholl, Chairman Johnson and Van Hoeven; Mister Marshall's response was recorded in the transcript as present. The board certified the closed meeting.
Speaker 3 moved to adjourn the session and proceed to the regular meeting; the motion carried on a voice vote. The meeting then continued with the board's regular agenda.
Details that the board discussed in closed session — including the identity of any prospective county administrator or business, contract terms for broadband or audit services, and litigation strategy — were not disclosed in the public portion of the transcript. No formal votes on hiring, contracting or economic incentives were recorded in open session.
