Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Human Resources topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff recommend ADP HRIS after evaluation; supervisors request full pricing and policy updates before final action
Summary
After evaluating NEOGOV and ADP for a county HRIS, staff recommended ADP for its payroll integration and long-term value; supervisors asked for detailed cost figures and noted policy changes and implementation commitments would be required before adopting the platform.
County HR and finance staff presented an evaluation of two HR information platforms — NEOGOV and ADP — and recommended ADP for the county's integrated human-resources, payroll and time-attendance needs.
Staff described NEOGOV’s strengths in applicant tracking and public‑sector recruiting and ADP’s advantages in payroll, analytics and integrated HR‑finance workflows. Supervisors asked about procurement through the Omnia cooperative contract and how invoicing would be phased for the first year; staff said ADP participates on an Omnia contract and that invoicing timing depends on implementation start dates. Several supervisors declined to vote that night without complete cost details, and staff agreed to return with final pricing and a schedule; they also noted that adopting an electronic time and payroll system would require updates to county personnel policies.
The matter was scheduled for further action and a public packet with the full numbers was requested before any final board vote.
