Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Ohio committee hears competing app-age bills; tech firms, advocates and law-enforcement testify
Summary
Committee hearings on SB167 (app-store parental consent) and SB175 (targeted age-signal and parental controls) drew testimony from Meta, Google, developers, child-safety advocates, law enforcement and legal counsel, with debate focused on enforcement, privacy, constitutionality, and browser or sideloading workarounds.
The Senate Financial Institutions, Insurance and Technology Committee heard extended sponsor and proponent testimony on two competing approaches to online age verification and parental controls.
SB167 (described in testimony as the App Store Accountability Act) would require app stores to verify age and obtain parental permission when a teen attempts to download an app, placing a centralized verification and consent flow at the App Store level so parents link their accounts once and do not repeatedly provide sensitive information to dozens of apps. Jennifer Hanley, head of safety policy for North America at Meta, said the approach reduces data exposure and is privacy-protective because app stores would share only a secure age range or a parent-approved signal rather than raw identity documents. Hanley told the panel that partial or selective age verification on some surfaces would fail because teens could…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
