Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Harrah Container Service topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission backs modified proffers to allow container service but bars transfer-station use
Summary
Frederick County planners recommended approval of a modified M-1 proffer for Harrah Properties (1290 Fairfax Pike) to explicitly permit container services/solid-waste management while including a condition that the site not be used as a transfer station; the commission asked staff to tighten proffers on storage and operations.
The Planning Commission on Sept. 3 recommended approval of a proffer amendment for 13 acres at 1290 Fairfax Pike to clarify permitted uses in the M-1 zoning district and to include solid waste management language tied to NAICS classifications.
Staff said the amendment is a cleanup item to reflect the county's transition to NAICS industry language and that the modification clarifies that the property's prior approval envisioned container services and truck/fleet maintenance among the allowed uses. The property lies east of I-81 in the South Frederick area and is identified in the county's Route 277 triangle centers of economic opportunity.
David Frank, the applicant's representative, told the commission the operations are the same as those approved last October: crews deliver empty roll-off containers to customers, pick up full containers and haul them to landfills, and on occasion rinse containers as needed. He emphasized the business primarily hauls construction and demolition (C&D) debris rather than organic municipal waste.
Commissioners raised several operational concerns, including whether dumpsters would be stored on site, whether rinse bays and washwater collection would be provided, the potential for odors, and whether reclassifying the use to "solid waste management" could allow a transfer station in the future. Staff and the applicant said rinsing/cleaning could occur occasionally and that the site currently operates as a container service. Several commissioners asked for proffer language to limit the use to roll-off/container services and to require enclosed storage for materials that could be unsightly.
Commissioner Jonah moved to recommend approval conditioned on language that the site be used for container service only (not a transfer station) and other clarifying proffers; the motion was seconded and passed by voice vote. The commission will forward its recommendation to the Board of Supervisors on Sept. 24.
Votes at the planning commission: the motion recommending approval with the container-service-only condition carried by voice vote with recorded affirmative votes from commissioners present.
Next steps: The Board of Supervisors will consider the item at its Sept. 24 meeting; site-plan level details (wash bays, waste-storage enclosures) will be addressed in subsequent site-plan review.
