Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HB 297 Memorial Day Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sponsors propose doubling county Memorial Day support to $1,000; members debate higher funding or CPI indexing
Summary
Sponsors of HB 297 told the House Veterans and Military Development Committee the bill would raise the per-organization county appropriation limit for Memorial Day support from $500 to $1,000; members questioned whether $1,000 is sufficient, asked about CPI indexing and local procurement preferences and discussed property-tax funding tradeoffs.
Representatives Ritter and Newman presented sponsor testimony for House Bill 297 at the House Veterans and Military Development Committee, proposing to increase the maximum county appropriation available to veterans organizations for Memorial Day costs from $500 to $1,000 per organization.
"Our legislation would double that limit to a thousand," Representative Ritter said, describing the change as a small but necessary adjustment to keep up with inflation while retaining existing accountability measures. Sponsors emphasized that current rules would remain in place: organizations applying for funds must submit a statement of expenses incurred, provide a sworn accounting of expenditures within 60 days of Memorial Day, and return any unspent funds to the county.
Members raised budget and policy questions. Representative Hall said $1,000 may still be insufficient for some Memorial Day events and suggested higher amounts ("$3,000 to $4,000") or a CPI-based adjustment. Representative McNally asked for clarification whether the $1,000 is a cap (answer: it replaces the present $500 limit). Representative Bumbari asked whether counties could require or encourage vendors to be in-state to support local small businesses; sponsors said they would look into the suggestion.
Representative Newman noted county funding streams and potential tensions: the funds typically derive from property-tax allocations and the 0.5-mill VSC allotment in some counties, which can limit available resources depending on local budgets. The sponsors committed to following up with additional information about county-commissioner association feedback and possible program design changes.
What’s next: HB 297 received sponsor testimony and committee discussion; no committee vote was recorded during this first hearing, and sponsors said they would provide additional information on procurement language and county feedback if requested by members.
