Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Solid Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board narrowly directs administrator to seek "better deal" from regional landfill authority
Summary
After extended debate about past regional landfill negotiations, the Campbell County Board of Supervisors voted 4'3 to authorize County Administrator Frank Rogers to contact the regional authority's chair to discuss payments to other members, governance/control and financial terms of a potential reopening of landfill expansion talks.
Campbell County supervisors debated whether to reopen negotiations with the regional authority that previously proposed a landfill expansion. The issue prompted sharp back-and-forth over the prior deal, public opposition at past hearings and ongoing litigation over disputed funds and governance.
Supervisor exchanges recounted the prior public hearing in which opponents "banged the table," and several supervisors said residents continue to ask what the county can do to recover or avoid perceived harms from that arrangement. One supervisor argued the county received a poor financial deal and said many constituents want the county to try again for a different arrangement; another urged caution, pointing out that litigation continues and that the county may have limited leverage.
After the discussion the board recorded a direction to County Administrator Frank Rogers to reach out to the regional authority's chair to express interest in exploring a "better deal" and to raise three focal negotiation points staff should pursue: payments to other member jurisdictions, board composition/control and the division of financial/proctoring responsibilities. Meeting notes recorded that the vote on that direction was 4 in favor and 3 opposed.
The session also revisited related topics tied to solid-waste strategy: whether the county could secure a larger share of decision-making on regional assets, the public reaction at the original hearing and the county's ongoing legal actions. Rogers and other staff cautioned that the outreach is exploratory and not a renegotiation in public; supervisors said they would rather have staff make a discreet inquiry than reopen the full public process immediately.
What's next: Frank Rogers is to contact the regional chair and report back to the board on whether the authority is willing to discuss revised terms. The board's instruction did not authorize any agreement or financial commitment; any further talks would return to the board for policy decisions and formal votes.
