Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Foreign Land Ownership topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House committee hears bill to bar "foreign adversary" property purchases near critical infrastructure

Ohio House Public Safety Committee · March 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sponsors reintroduced the Property Protection Act (HB1) to bar purchases by listed foreign adversaries within 25 miles of military bases and critical infrastructure; members pressed sponsors on scope, economic impacts, grandfathering of existing owners and how federal adversary lists will be applied.

Representatives Angie King and Ray Klopfenstein presented House Bill 1 — described by sponsors as Ohio's Property Protection Act — which would prohibit buyers identified as "foreign adversaries" on a federal list from purchasing property within 25 miles of military installations and designated critical infrastructure. King and Klopfenstein framed the bill as a national‑security measure aimed at closing vulnerabilities around bases, water systems and transportation nodes.

Sponsors described several enforcement measures: a conveyance attestation requiring the buyer to affirm they are not prohibited under the statute, local sheriff investigations when concerns arise, and referral to the county prosecutor for potential violations. Klopfenstein told the committee the bill is a reintroduction of prior legislation and noted the difficulty of detecting complex ownership chains used to conceal ultimate owners.

Members expressed a range of concerns. Representative Brent and others asked how the measure would affect lawful residents and workers (including physicians and athletes) from allied nations or holders of visas/green cards; sponsors said the bill targets foreign adversaries and does not affect U.S. citizens, dual citizens, leases, or existing owners (grandfathering was confirmed for current owners). Representative Brewer asked whether the 25‑mile radius applied so broadly that most of the state would be restricted; sponsors said the bill targets specific critical infrastructure categories and noted other states use narrower distances (e.g., a 10‑mile rule in one neighboring state).

The committee did not vote on HB1 at the hearing; sponsors and members agreed further discussion and technical drafting will be required on definitions, enforcement mechanics and potential economic consequences.