Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
St. Louis County councilors and contractors press for clearer procurement rules, stronger enforcement
Summary
Council members and stakeholders met Sept. 3 to review proposed revisions to Chapter 107 (procurement). Key changes include a 'best value' procurement option, clarified apprenticeship definitions tied to federal registration, stronger prequalification and utilization-plan protections for subcontractors, and discussion of prompt-pay enforcement.
Councilwoman Denice Days convened the St. Louis County Committee of the Whole on Sept. 3 for a workshop to review proposed changes to Chapter 107 of the county procurement code and to hear testimony from contractors, unions and industry groups.
The session, led in large part by Councilwoman Lisa Webb, focused on definitions, oversight and new contracting tools. "We will move forward to make sure that we have a procurement process that would encourage people to do business with St. Louis County, weed out and hold bad actors accountable, and then at the same time be able to actually become opportunity central as it pertains to procurement," Councilwoman Webb said as she introduced the stakeholder-driven draft.
Procurement director Steve Mifflin described the proposed "best value" method for awarding contracts, saying it would allow the county to award based on "price and other relevant factors, which taken together are deemed to provide the best overall value to the county rather than the lowest price." He said the county will use evaluation committees and scoring methodologies so selections away from the lowest bidder are documented.
Labor and trade representatives urged tighter protections for subcontractors and stronger enforcement of contract terms. Nate Adams, the county's MWBE program director, described a case in which a prime contractor substituted a subcontractor after contract award and said "the difference in price was $200,000. We didn't get that money back. It went in his pocket," pressing the council to lock utilization plans and stop post-award bid-shopping.
Multiple witnesses recommended a formal prequalification program. Maureen McDonnell of the Associated General Contractors of Missouri said prequalification — a process used by MoDOT and MSD — would increase qualified bidding and contractor confidence, and suggested expanding any residency-hours requirement to the metropolitan statistical area to draw more bidders.
Speakers also pressed for mechanisms to enforce prompt payment and to hold contractors accountable for certified payroll, insurance and licensing. Jeff Lewis, representing union interests, urged adding or strengthening vendor suspension, disbarment and payment-withhold provisions so the county can prevent repeat bad actors from winning large contracts that then leave small subcontractors unpaid for months.
Labor representatives and contractors discussed apprenticeship language. Clint McBride, identified in testimony as a government-affairs director with Labor's Local union representation, recommended linking county apprenticeship requirements to apprenticeships registered with the U.S. Department of Labor to avoid reliance on unregistered programs with limited training or oversight.
On jurisdictional reach, staff flagged legal limits: Mifflin said some quasi-public entities could fall under the ordinance if the county appoints their boards, but separately elected entities (for example, school boards) likely could not. He recommended legal review of a clause (section 24) that attempted to extend the ordinance's reach to other instrumentalities.
Council members emphasized oversight and final authority. Mifflin said delegations of spending authority would remain, but that fundamental determinations of responsibility, responsiveness and price reasonableness would rest with the procurement agent.
Webb said the draft responds to state audit findings that previously identified gaps — including unclear IFB/RFP use and the potential for contracts to be held indefinitely by the county executive — and that she plans an internal audit after implementation to ensure the updates address those findings.
The committee did not take any recorded roll-call votes on ordinance language at the workshop. Webb said a second stakeholder session will be scheduled after members and participants have time to review the circulated draft; she noted work on the county's budget will constrain scheduling. With no further business on the workshop agenda, Council Chair Days moved to adjourn.
