Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Liquor Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses draft liquor‑code change to allow limited hard‑liquor displays at convenience stores
Summary
Staff proposed modifying the village’s class N liquor license to allow limited hard‑liquor displays behind the counter at certain convenience stores; the board asked about historical reasons for fuel‑based distinctions, enforcement (register lockouts, 2 a.m. sales limit), display‑size limits, and requested staff draft ordinance language for further review.
Village staff presented options to amend the liquor code to permit limited sales of hard liquor at some convenience stores. Director Jennings said the liquor and license commission had considered a request from the new operator of the Shell convenience store by Ernie's to allow hard‑liquor sales and that staff drafted an approach to modify the existing class N license language.
The proposed amendment would remove the current reference to fuel sales from the license class and apply a square‑footage and display‑location restriction specifically to hard liquor, while leaving existing beer and wine rules unchanged. Jennings described the practical outcome: beer and wine could remain displayed generally in a store, but hard spirits would be subject to a restricted display area (for example, behind the counter) and a capped shelf surface area rather than bottle‑size limits.
Trustees sought clarification on why the fuel/nonfuel distinction existed originally; staff suggested it reflected historical municipal practices to limit full liquor in gas stations. Questions also addressed enforcement mechanisms (register lockouts and complaint‑basis enforcement), hours of sale (2 a.m. limit was cited), and whether the proposed restriction would be a square‑footage limit versus limiting specific bottle sizes.
Staff said one path would be to revise the class N text as drafted and return an ordinance for formal review; another option would be to create a subclass or new class if trustees prefer to preserve a fuel/nonfuel distinction. Trustees indicated general support for staff drafting ordinance language and for returning the matter to the liquor and license commission for a focused application review.
No formal motion to change code language was adopted at this meeting; staff sought consensus to proceed with drafting ordinance language and to have the interested applicant appear before the liquor and license commission for a specific request.
