Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Lawyers and advocates split over supported decision‑making language in HB 96
Summary
Caroline La Larman testified against embedding supported decision‑making (SDM) into HB 96, warning it could expose adults with developmental disabilities to undue influence and financial harm; APSE and other advocates argued the law provides protections and is used in many states.
Caroline La Larman, a parent and attorney, told the House Health Committee she opposes language in HB 96 that would codify supported decision‑making (SDM) for adults with developmental disabilities. Larman said SDM can look like a contract that allows a supporter to implement decisions and, in some cases, could place mentally incompetent adults at risk of exploitation. “This is essentially a guardianship in a way without the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
