Virginia Beach council hears HRT pitch as stormwater limits and VBDA reluctance stall Corporate Landing plan
Loading...
Summary
Hampton Roads Transit officials told the City Council their proposed Corporate Landing maintenance facility would bring 125 higher‑paid jobs and $130 million in secured federal grant funds, but city engineers and the Virginia Beach Development Authority said site stormwater limits and unapproved variances make Corporate Landing unsuitable without major changes.
Hampton Roads Transit officials urged the Virginia Beach City Council to help keep a regionally significant bus maintenance and operations facility in Corporate Landing, saying the project brings new service capacity, 125 jobs and $130 million in committed federal grant funding. Council members and city staff said the site faces substantial technical and policy barriers that remain unresolved.
Amanda (city/VBDA staff) briefed council on the HRT Corporate Landing proposal and the background of a 2021 Virginia Beach Development Authority (VBDA) resolution that authorized selling 11 acres to HRT at $200,000 per acre. Staff said the resolution’s deadlines have expired, no purchase or option agreement was executed, and VBDA told HRT in December 2024 it did not intend to pursue the project on the property.
Why it matters: HRT says the new Southside facility is essential to expand service and shorten headways on core routes, while staff and commissioners warn that relaxing Corporate Landing’s design guidelines and stormwater standards would reduce capacity available to future economic development across the business park.
City engineers from VHB explained the central technical hurdle: the parcel’s design criteria assume roughly 60% impervious surface area under the Corporate Landing master stormwater plan; a bus maintenance campus would require near 85% impervious coverage to support heavy buses. VHB said that excess imperviousness would push stormwater treatment demands onto adjacent parcels or require costly on‑site solutions, and that underground storage is constrained because buses (especially battery‑electric models) are heavier and need thicker pavement.
HRT representatives, including Harold (President and CEO) and Sybil Pappas, disputed that the project was stalled for lack of local will and said HRT has committed grant funds they view as site specific. Pappas stated, “We do have grant money, a $130,000,000 of committed grant money in our hand,” and warned that if the project cannot be developed on the awarded site the federal award could be jeopardized. HRT also told the council it had offered to purchase excess pond capacity (staff recorded offers beginning at $13,000 and later discussed figures up to $400,000–$500,000).
Council members split between two priorities: several urged staff and VBDA to continue negotiating ways to accommodate HRT to capture the federal dollars and expand transit service; others emphasized that long‑held stormwater standards and fair treatment of Corporate Landing applicants require careful review before granting setbacks or impervious‑coverage variances. One staffer summarized the tradeoff: allowing 85% impervious coverage for this site could limit capacity for the remaining roughly 51 acres in the park and constrain future taxable development.
What happened next: Council did not take immediate formal action on a sale or amendment; members asked staff and VBDA to continue discussions and report back. Staff noted the federal record shows funds in the grant must be obligated by Sept. 30, 2026, but HRT emphasized operational urgency to expand service frequency. The council directed continued conversations rather than approving any variances or sale today.
Council context and next steps: The VBDA remains the owner/marketer of Corporate Landing property and retains discretion over any sale or amended terms; council members asked VBDA and city negotiators to pursue additional site options, engineering alternatives, and more complete cost estimates for stormwater mitigation before any binding commitment.
Ending: The briefing put the competing aims—preserving a site‑specific federal grant and protecting the business‑park master plan—squarely before council. Staff and HRT agreed to continue talks and explore alternative sites or technical fixes; council members encouraged expediency but did not authorize any change of standards or a property sale tonight.
