Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Policy Non Retaliation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Corvallis School Board finds policies not followed, orders bias documentation and staff training
Summary
The Corvallis School District board voted unanimously Aug. 18 to find that policies ACB and ACB AR were not followed in a recent complaint, to reaffirm its non‑retaliation policy, to document potential bias, to seek written assurance to the appellant, to implement districtwide anti‑Blackness training, and to revise policy JBB to include an action plan with measurable goals.
The Corvallis School District Board voted unanimously Aug. 18 to find that policies ACB and ACB AR were not followed in a complaint and to direct a series of follow‑up steps, including documenting potential bias, providing written assurance to the appellant, implementing districtwide staff training on anti‑Blackness and amending policy JBB to include a measurable action plan.
The motion, moved by board member Judah and seconded by board member Therese, directs the district to: (1) find that policies ACB and ACB AR were not followed in the referred complaint; (2) reiterate and reaffirm a districtwide commitment to the existing non‑retaliation policy and provide that assurance in writing to the appellant; (3) document potential bias for purposes of complying with ACB AR; (4) implement districtwide staff training on anti‑Blackness within this school year, if feasible, or at the earliest possible date thereafter; and (5) amend policy JBB to create an action plan with distinct goals and measurable progress indicators.
The motion was read into the record several times after members requested clarification about the policies named and the practical steps the district would take. Board members discussed whether the JBB language itself should be changed to incorporate the action plan or whether the board should set goals under JBB’s existing reporting requirement. Members also noted that policy revisions requiring public notice could not be completed immediately and that timing for implementation would depend on feasibility.
During discussion members asked whether the board could provide the written assurance to the appellant and whether that assurance would require budgetary action; district staff (referenced in the record) indicated that providing written assurance would be appropriate. The motion’s language includes the commitment to provide that assurance in writing.
The motion also specifies a timeline for training: "within this school year, if feasible, or the earliest possible date thereafter." The board did not adopt a specific date at the meeting; the motion asks staff to pursue the training on that schedule and to report progress as part of the JBB action plan reporting.
Chair called for a vote after no further discussion; roll‑call responses were affirmative and the chair announced, "Motion passes unanimously." The meeting adjourned at 6:31 p.m.
Next steps identified in the motion include directing staff to draft the written assurance to the appellant, documenting potential bias consistent with ACB AR, proposing text edits to policy JBB that would establish measurable goals and reporting intervals, and planning the districtwide anti‑Blackness training within the timeframe specified. The motion does not itself set a binding training curriculum, budget line item or implementation details; those operational items were left to staff work and subsequent board review.
