Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Twinsburg council approves tower-lease amendment, ARB and fee ordinances; moves into executive session
Summary
At its Sept. 23 meeting the Twinsburg City Council adopted a tower-lease amendment and two ordinances updating Architectural Review Board rules and certain fees, approved a non-opposition for a MAPCO liquor permit and then entered executive session to discuss personnel and litigation.
Twinsburg City Council voted on several items at its Sept. 23 meeting and then moved into an executive session to discuss personnel matters and pending litigation. The council approved a resolution amending a tower lease, adopted new Architectural Review Board rules and updated fee provisions, authorized submission of a non-opposition letter for a liquor permit application and excused absent members before adjourning into closed session.
Resolution 87, 2025, which authorizes the mayor to enter into an amendment to a tower lease agreement with NCWP CS NPL 25 Year Sites Towers Holding, LLC, was moved, seconded and adopted by roll call 4–0. Mrs. Walker voted in favor; the clerk called the roll and recorded the unanimous approval.
Ordinance 88, 2025 (repealing Ordinance 59, 2025 and amending the City of Twinsburg’s codified regulations related to the Architectural Review Board), passed on a voice/roll-call motion and recorded as 4–0 in favor. Council discussion on the ordinance was brief and no amendments were recorded in the meeting transcript.
Ordinance 89, 2025 (amending Section 149 of the codified ordinances regarding fees and deposits), likewise passed on first consideration with a recorded roll-call vote of 4–0.
Separately, council moved that it "does not oppose" a new liquor permit application for MMCS Services LLC, doing business as MAPCO at 987 North Royalton Road; the clerk was authorized to submit the form to the Ohio Division of Liquor Control. That motion passed on a 4–0 roll call.
Council also approved a procedural motion to excuse three absent members (Mrs. Labby, Mr. Barr and Mr. Post) by a 4–0 roll-call vote.
Finally, council voted to enter executive session under Ohio Revised Code 121.22(G)(1) for personnel and 121.22(G)(3) to consult with counsel about pending litigation. The motion passed on a recorded 4–0 vote and the meeting moved into closed session.
No other final actions on Ordinances 84–86 or Resolution 85 (items related to data-center zoning and the planning commission determination) were taken at this meeting; those items were announced as passed over for later consideration.
