Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Northpointe Phase2 Pip topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Plan commission approves Northpointe phase‑2 PIP for 55-unit senior affordable housing with conditions
Summary
The Monona Plan Commission approved a precise implementation plan (PIP) for Northpointe Development’s 55-unit age‑restricted residential building on East Broadway, adding conditions on shared access, lighting, cameras, parking revisions and long‑term supportive services required by tax‑credit commitments.
The Monona Plan Commission voted to approve Northpointe Development Corporation’s precise implementation plan (PIP) for a senior, age‑restricted multifamily building at approximately 1208–1212 East Broadway, subject to findings and conditions.
Applicant Sean O’Brien described the phase‑2 residential component as 55 units (42 one‑bedroom, 13 two‑bedroom), primarily one‑bedroom units, and outlined commitments to rooftop photovoltaic systems, EV charging conduit, and energy certifications tied to funder requirements. O’Brien said the project secured affordable housing tax credits, enabling the applicant to proceed to PIP review.
Doug (city staff) presented the staff recommendation noting the PIP is consistent with an earlier approved general development plan (GDP) and that because the site is within Redevelopment Area/TID No. 6 the CDA and city council will also review financing/authorization. He summarized that the PIP proposes about 60% green space, community and exercise rooms and a parking program for phase‑2 of 68 stalls (42 underground, 26 surface); staff noted the proposed count falls short of the city’s standard but recommended shared parking and easement solutions.
John Solomon of Strand Associates reviewed engineering comments: geotechnical borings and the final geotech report are pending, and the consultant recommended verifying overland flow routes, confirming parking stall dimensions and counts, expanding bioretention berm top width for maintenance, flattening side slopes toward 3:1 (4:1 preferred) where possible, and ensuring runoff is directed to the basin rather than toward Broadway or adjacent properties.
Commissioners questioned floodplain risk for the underground parking; applicants answered that residential floors are above flood elevations and that engineering and design features (ramp elevations, protective grade treatments and standard protections used on earlier nearby projects) will prevent flood inflow to protected residential areas while the underground parking will be designed with appropriate barriers and drainage.
Other review items included shared access easements between the residential and adjacent commercial lots, locating trash enclosures on concrete pads and coordinating a parking agreement for shared stalls. The police chief recommended improved lighting for the underground parking and installation of security cameras on the south end; applicant said cameras and enhanced lighting will be included. Commissioners emphasized adding more street trees and robust landscape plantings.
Staff and applicant also discussed conditions carried from phase 1: requirements for on‑site management and supportive‑service commitments for up to 30 years to meet tax‑credit funding promises; applicant confirmed the commitments are part of the funding package.
On a motion to approve with staff findings and conditions (including shared parking easement, resolution of CSM/property line requirements, revised lighting plan to staff, south‑end cameras, parking lot revisions, and other standard items), the commission voted in favor and approved the PIP.
What happens next: the PIP will be recorded and the applicant must finalize the certified survey map or equivalent resolution, submit refined drainage and parking plans for staff approval, and satisfy CDA/city council requirements associated with TID financing and tax‑credit conditions.
