Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Entertainment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Portsmouth tightens rules for entertainment venues and expands enforcement authority in 5–2 vote
Summary
The City Council adopted ordinance Z-25-01 to create a new private‑club category, tighten standards for event spaces and give the zoning administrator clearer tools—including permit revocation—to address disorderly operations. The measure passed 5–2 after hours of public comment about noise and violence near clubs.
Portsmouth City Council on Aug. 26 adopted an amendment to the city—s zoning code that adds a distinct "private club" category for uses similar to event spaces and grants the zoning administrator faster enforcement options, including revoking occupancy and use permits.
The 5–2 vote followed more than two hours of public comment in which residents described repeated nights of loud music, violence and safety concerns near entertainment venues. "Just Thursday night, shots got fired behind our houses," said resident Vincent Majors, who told the council multiple homes had been struck. "We want to go to sleep tonight, not live in fear." Several other speakers urged quicker enforcement rather than relying solely on new rules.
City Attorney LaVonda Graham Williams said the ordinance codifies tools staff already uses and gives the zoning administrator authority to act more swiftly: "There is a section that talks about the ability for the city to revoke the use permit previously provided. It also provides for a new avenue where the zoning administrator may revoke the occupancy license for those who do not have a use permit," Williams told the council. She added the city is working on legislation to allow use permits to expire so future regulatory changes can apply to holders of those permits.
Planning staff described the intent to distinguish private clubs from civic, social or fraternal organizations so that nonprofit groups are not unduly burdened. Dr. Russell, a planning staffer, said the new definition and use-specific standards respond to commissioners— concerns that existing rules did not adequately differentiate similar uses.
Council supporters framed the changes as a public-safety measure. "The actions taken by council tonight are centered entirely on public safety," Councilwoman Bridal said, thanking staff, the planning commission and the police for their work. Dissenting council members said enforcement capacity remains the critical issue; several residents and council members pressed for follow-up actions that included increased enforcement staff, clearer complaint procedures and neighborhood outreach.
The ordinance also enumerates specific instances that can trigger revocation or council review of a use permit, and staff said those provisions will allow swifter action when an operation demonstrably threatens health and safety. The council and staff urged residents to report incidents and to be available as witnesses when enforcement actions proceed, noting enforcement relies on documented complaints.
The ordinance is effective upon adoption; staff signaled plans to monitor outcomes and return to council with amendments if needed.
What happens next: staff will implement the new permitting language and enforcement procedures; the city attorney and manager said they will follow up with residents about existing complaints and consider additional enforcement tools under state law.
