Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Treatment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lakeville staff previews Fisher parcel site options and three water‑treatment alternatives
Summary
City staff described site‑plan concepts for the newly acquired Fisher parcel — including housing, limited commercial and space potentially reserved for public‑works storage — and presented three water‑treatment alternatives: expand the existing plant (~$26M), build a satellite plant on the Fisher site (~$44M), or a bypass option with limited filtration. Council raised access and cost concerns and deferred decisions pending market interest and the 2026 comp‑plan update.
Lakeville City staff presented master‑site concepts for the recently acquired Fisher parcel and a fresh analysis of options to meet the city’s future water‑treatment needs. The Fisher concepts place higher‑density housing or commercial uses north of a planned fire station and reserve land near the water tower for a satellite treatment facility, public‑works storage, or other civic uses.
The consultant and staff emphasized access constraints: the parcel has limited access from the south and east and is expected to rely primarily on Dodd Boulevard. “We’ve acquired the property, the process of demoing the property,” Speaker 3 said, and staff later urged reserving a small portion next to the water tower for future flexibility.
Why it matters: the city must choose how to meet projected demand while minimizing lifecycle cost and preserving operations. Staff presented three high‑level alternatives developed with Black & Veatch: expand the existing treatment plant (staff estimate shown at about $26,000,000 including contingencies), build a new satellite plant on the Fisher property (about $44,000,000 estimated), or adopt a bypass approach that adds pumping/storage but provides no additional full filtration. Staff said the study identified a need of roughly 6.6 million gallons per day of additional treatment capacity under the city’s build‑out assumptions (target production near 33,100,000 gallons/day with safety factors).
Staff discussed tradeoffs. A satellite plant would provide operational redundancy and easier future installation of secondary treatment for contaminants such as PFOS, while expanding the existing plant would retain current water quality and be less costly up front. The bypass option is lowest cost initially but would not remove aesthetic contaminants such as iron and manganese and would rely on increased pumping and storage rather than filtration. “If the main plant goes down ... we could support the city with” a satellite, staff said, stressing redundancy as a resilience argument.
Council asked about secondary‑treatment needs and personnel. Staff said adding capacity will likely require at least one additional operator for a satellite plant and that adding advanced treatment for contaminants at the existing plant could be difficult because of existing piping configurations. Timing and next steps: demolition and site cleanup are underway; staff expects to incorporate mass grading with fire‑station construction planned to begin in 2026 and advised the council that a comp‑plan update and additional engineering work through 2026 will provide firmer sizing and cost numbers. Councilmembers expressed interest in reserving some land for redundancy but did not authorize a final project.
Next procedural step: staff will bring further analysis, a rate study and refined cost estimates as the comp‑plan and site design work proceeds; no formal action was taken at the work session.
