Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves exemption from required classroom-teacher spending; trustees question contracted services and program effectiveness
Summary
Trustees unanimously authorized an application for an exemption from the state required expenditures for classroom teacher salaries (CEA) after staff showed the district's CEA at 53.74% and explained how contracting and categorical funding affect the state formula.
The board voted Sept. 4 to authorize an application to the county office of education for an exemption from the Classroom Expenditures Accountability (CEA) percentage, after a staff presentation explaining why the district did not meet the statutory threshold.
Dr. Westover explained the formula and the district—s position: the numerator counts certificated classroom salaries while the denominator is total spending with specified exclusions. "Currently our CEA is at 53.74%," he said, and noted that many districts statewide are also not meeting the elementary threshold. He showed a graphic demonstrating that if direct student-support personnel such as counselors were counted in the numerator the district—s percentage would exceed the requirement.
Presenters and trustees emphasized that a substantial portion of the denominator consists of contracted services, including special education and other direct supports that, because they are contracted, increase the denominator without increasing the numerator. Trustees asked for a detailed breakdown of contracted services and for analysis of whether some services (for example PE, music or literacy coaching) could be brought in-house without harming program delivery.
Public commenters urged the board to consider whether literacy coaches and music/PE services should be employed staff rather than vendors so those staff could be site-based and more consistently available to students.
Trustee Connolly moved to approve filing the exemption application; Trustee Henry seconded and the motion passed unanimously. Staff said the county—s determination could release or withhold funds depending on the county—s review of comparable districts' salary and benefit schedules.
The board requested additional program-effectiveness information and a detailed contract breakdown to inform any future decisions about moving services in-house.
