Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Traffic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lake County delays County Road 448 warehouse rezoning to allow traffic study
Summary
Commissioners postponed decisions on a proposed warehouse, truck shop and truck yard at County Road 448 to Nov. 4 after members expressed concern that the applicant’s trip-generation estimates, based on ITE tables, may understate peak-hour truck traffic; the applicant agreed to complete a traffic study.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Traffic topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Lake County Board of County Commissioners voted Sept. 2 to postpone consideration of a rezoning and future-land-use amendment for a proposed warehouse and truck facility on County Road 448 until Nov. 4 so the applicant can complete a traffic study.
Janie Brown, planning manager, told the board the application seeks to change the property’s future land use and zoning to allow a warehouse, truck maintenance shop and truck yard under a planned industrial district. The proposal includes a 40,000-square-foot warehouse, an 8,000-square-foot truck shop and a 2,000-square-foot office, and staff presented the project’s concept plan and development standards.
Public-works engineering director Jeff Earhart said the county’s standard trip-generation tables showed an estimated 17 peak-hour trips for the proposed uses. “It is 17 peak hour during either the morning rush or the afternoon rush,” Earhart said, distinguishing peak-hour estimates from daily totals.
The applicant’s civil engineer, Selby Weeks, said the project is not a distribution center but a private trucking business that stores and services its own vehicles. “This is for my client who owns a private, Overland trucking business,” Weeks said, and added that the industry-standard ITE manual was used to estimate trips.
Several commissioners remained unconvinced that ITE-based estimates capture local conditions along the two available routes from the site. Commissioner Smith said the board needed to consider downstream impacts: “Second and third order effects further down the roadway” could be significant given the limited road choices in the area, he said.
After discussion and conflicting motions, the board accepted a motion to postpone both the future-land-use and zoning items to Nov. 4 to give the applicant time to complete the traffic study and for staff to review it. The motion passed 5-0.
Next steps: the applicant will complete and submit a traffic study; staff will review the findings and present the results at the Nov. 4 meeting for the board to consider alongside any proposed stipulations (for example, limiting the site to storage-only warehouse uses or restricting the truck shop to owner vehicles).
