Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reallocates school construction dollars and approves National Board teacher bonuses

Virginia State Board of Education · December 4, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved reallocation of $3,034,425 in SCAP funds to finish ongoing projects and fully fund Richmond City Alternative School, and approved distribution of $4.997 million to pay bonuses to classroom National Board certified teachers ($5,000 first year; $2,500 thereafter).

The Virginia State Board of Education approved two funding actions aimed at getting projects and incentives moving while department staff continue detailed planning.

First, in a first‑and‑final action the board approved a staff recommendation to reallocate $3,034,425 of unused Schools Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) funds resulting from reduced project scopes in Patrick County and Lynchburg City. Staff recommended, and the board approved, fully funding the Richmond City Alternative School project (which had been prorated in April) and allocating the remaining funds to two other partially‑funded projects. Department presenters said the immediate approval was needed so mid‑project recipients could proceed.

Second, the board approved distribution of FY2025 budgeted funds totaling $4,997,500 to implement teacher incentive payments for holders of National Board certification. Under the approved distribution, classroom teachers who hold National Board certification will receive a $5,000 payment in the first year of certification and $2,500 annually thereafter for the life of the certificate. The board emphasized that the immediate action covers currently certified classroom teachers; department staff will return in February with recommendations on how to prioritize candidates, non‑classroom certificants (principals, counselors, central office) and funds for applicant support in Title I schools.

Members discussed whether the dollars should be targeted to shortage subjects or high‑need schools but staff and counsel noted the appropriation language and statute constrain immediate redistribution; the board directed staff to bring options for prioritization and any remaining funds at the February meeting.

Both motions passed on recorded voice roll calls.