Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Commission Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: minutes, consent calendar, contract amendment, urban water plan and MOUs

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission · June 14, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On June 14 the SFPUC approved meeting minutes, passed most consent items (with 8L severed for follow-up), approved amendment CS879C, adopted the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, authorized an MOU to study indirect potable reuse and authorized release of $120.8 million in recycled-water reserves for West Side projects.

Key formal actions taken by the commission on June 14:

- Approval of minutes from May (motion carried).

- Consent calendar: Items A–K approved by single vote after item 8L was removed for separate consideration; the removed item will return with additional staff follow-up on pest-control materials and IPM compliance.

- Item 9: Approved amendment number 4 to agreement CS879C, increasing the agreement by $2,000,000 and authorizing a three-year extension (motion moved and carried).

- Item 11: Adopted the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for submittal to the state (due July 1).

- Item 12: Authorized a memorandum of understanding with Silicon Valley Clean Water, the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency and Cal Water to fund a feasibility study of indirect potable reuse (not to exceed $35,000; 18-month duration).

- Item 13: Authorized the general manager to execute a restated MOU with Recreation and Parks and to seek Board of Supervisors approval to release $120,827,000 in reserve funds for the recycled water and West Side groundwater projects.

- Closed session motions: The commission asserted attorney–client privilege in closed session and, upon return, voted not to disclose closed-session discussions; staff reported items 16–18 were settled.

Roll-call votes were used where required and motions were carried as announced at the meeting.