Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Balboa Reservoir topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Community member raises CEQA and City College concerns over Balboa Reservoir housing planning

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission · August 11, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At the Aug. 11 SFPUC meeting, Christine Hansen of the Save CCSF Coalition urged commissioners to consider cumulative CEQA impacts and the interests of City College when assessing potential housing development at the Balboa Reservoir parcel, noting a $22 million performing arts project by CCSF is not reflected in planning documents.

Christine Hansen, representing the Save CCSF Coalition, used the public comment period at the Aug. 11 SFPUC meeting to object to housing development processes underway for the 17.5‑acre Balboa Reservoir parcel. Hansen told commissioners the parcel is a single site shared by SFPUC and City College of San Francisco (CCSF) and warned staff to avoid common CEQA mistakes, including inadequate assessment of cumulative impacts and failing to account for past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects.

Hansen said CCSF has spent an estimated $22 million in preparation for a performing arts education center at the reservoir site, a project she said is not reflected in SFPUC planning documents. She questioned reliance on CCSF trustees' comments while the college is under a state‑imposed administration and its trustee meetings are not videotaped or broadly available for public review, asserting the college's governance status makes assessment of cumulative impacts "messy."

Her remarks asked the commission to ensure planning documents reflect the project's full history and to consider the interconnected use and history between CCSF and SFPUC on the Balboa parcel. No commission action on the matter occurred at the meeting; the comment was part of the communications/public comment portion of the agenda.