Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Puv Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PUC approves minutes, multiple contracts and Calaveras amendments; closed session settlements reported

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission · February 24, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved minutes, several consent items and contract amendments (including Calaveras project contract adjustments), separated one large RFQ item for discussion, and reported settlements for two closed‑session items; staff were asked to return with final budget tradeoffs where applicable.

At its Feb. 24 meeting the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission approved routine minutes and several consent and contract items, considered a high‑value procurement authorization separately, and accepted contract amendments tied to ongoing construction work.

The commission approved the minutes of its Feb. 10 meeting. The consent calendar was taken up and Commissioner (speaker 4) asked that Item 8C (authorization to advertise RFQ/RFP for agreement DB126 — a solicitation up to $51,000,000 over 15 years) be removed for separate discussion; the remaining consent items were approved and Item 8C was discussed and then approved with the caveat that staff return with a final budget and identify tradeoffs as design choices are made.

The commission approved agreement CS1010G to Friends of the Urban Forest (not to exceed $80,000, one year with renewals subject to commission approval) and authorized several contract amendments. Staff briefed the commission on amendments tied to the Calaveras project: the contractor encountered a subsurface landslide requiring excavation of additional material, which increased project scope and prompted requests to extend construction management contracts and adjust consultant costs. Staff explained the need for specialized consultants (NOA specialists, archaeologists) during excavation and recommended continuing the existing consultant team for continuity.

In closed session the commission reviewed litigation items; upon return the chair reported that items 16 and 17 were settled and the commission voted not to publicly disclose details.

Votes of record in the public transcript were unanimous “Aye” responses following motions and seconding where noted; individual roll‑call tallies were not recorded in the public transcript for every consent vote.